Oakland Magazine Blog
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Letter to Schwarzenegger
By Dan This letter was sent by a group of concerned citizens to the Governor and local officials on June 4, 2008. All content is from Stop the Spray East Bay, (510) 684-6484, e-mail.
Dear Governor Schwarzenegger,
We are writing to alert you to a counterproductive new tactic being used by the California Department of
Food and Agriculture (CDFA) in an ill-advised quest to promote a spraying program against the Light
Brown Apple Moth (LBAM): CDFA has begun an outreach campaign that will pit farming communities
against urban residents. We have grave concerns about the CDFA’s latest strategy of enlisting the support
of farming communities in the Central Valley for its spraying program in highly populated urban
counties. Ultimately, we believe this approach will divide the state and promote profound distrust in
government.
We are founding members of Stop the Spray - East Bay, a citizens’ coalition to stop the CDFA’s planned
pesticide spraying program. We oppose the spray program because we have serious questions about its
necessity, safety, and its likelihood of success. Those concerns are shared by many and are why 30 cities
and counties in the spray zone and 81 groups and organizations including school districts (see attached
list) have listened to the evidence provided by both the CDFA and local groups opposed to the spray, and
have voted to oppose the spray program. Not a single city in the spray zone that looked at the evidence
provided by the CDFA now supports the spray program. In addition, two jurisdictions have successfully
sued the CDFA and others are preparing to sue to stop the program. Please understand that the opposition
to the state’s current plan is growing rapidly and will continue to do so until the program is abandoned.
While the number of those opposed to the spray continues to grow, CDFA Secretary A.G. Kawamura has
pressed on, frequently misrepresenting the threat of the LBAM, overstating its impacts on agriculture, and
dismissing as “misinformed” the research of respected academics and others who are seeking to find a
better solution. Even two adverse court rulings that halted further spraying in Monterey and Santa Cruz
Counties until the CDFA complied with the California Environmental Quality Act’s requirement to
complete an Environmental Impact Report have not dissuaded the Secretary from continuing to seek
support for the spray program. Now he is turning to the farming community to rally their support for this
misguided effort without providing full disclosure of the facts and uncertainties that surround the
program.
For example, on May 14, 2008, the CDFA held an LBAM Forum in Reedley. During the Q&A, an
organic farmer from Madera said he had received a call from the Governor’s office asking him to support
the spray program. At first inclined to support it, he decided to do more research on the issue before
making a commitment. His research led him to conclude that the moth cannot thrive in the Central Valley
because local temperatures are too high for the moth to reproduce. He further stated that he checked with
several local UC entomologists who confirmed his research. He concluded by asking Secretary
Kawamura why he was in Reedley “stirring up fear” among farmers in the Central Valley.
During the CDFA presentation in Reedley, John Connell, Director of the CDFA Plant Health and Pest
Prevention Services, stated that the LBAM has been in California for 1-2 years, yet Secretary Kawamura
acknowledged 4 days earlier on a radio program that the CDFA now believes that the LBAM has been
here for 6-7 years. The Secretary did not correct Mr. Connell’s statement even though the justification for
the spray program relies heavily on the assertion that the moth has just recently arrived in California.
At the Reedley presentation, the Secretary touted the safety of the pesticide being used by pointing out
that the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) concluded that there was “no
link” between the pesticide spraying in Santa Cruz and Monterey counties and the more than 600 reports
of ill health effects. Similarly, at a May 27 CDFA presentation to the San Bruno City Council, CDFA’s
Dr. Robert Leavitt stated that OEHHA had concluded that “there was no connection between the reported
illnesses in Monterey and Santa Cruz counties and the Light Brown Apple Moth sprays.” These
representations of the report’s conclusion are not only misleading, but are incorrect. The OEHHA report
states that “[i]t is not possible to determine whether or not there is a link between any of the reported
symptoms and the aerial spraying” and “[m]ore than 90 percent of the 643 symptom reports do not
contain adequate information for us to determine whether or not there is a link between the reported
symptoms and the Checkmate applications.” In fact, OEHHA officials confirmed at a press
conference that they only analyzed 10 percent of the 643 health reports.
These are just a few examples of how the CDFA is misinforming the public, and they raise questions
about the credibility and honesty of the CDFA and the other state agencies that have been tasked to
support the CDFA in this campaign.
We ask that you immediately instruct the CDFA to cease its misrepresentation of the facts and end this
strategy that will eventually pit Californians against Californians. Caution the Secretary that creating a
rift between agricultural interests and their customers is not in anyone’s interest.
We also ask that you immediately halt all further plans to conduct an aerial or ground spraying program
for LBAM and that you instruct Secretary Kawamura to first involve independent scientists to ascertain
whether a response to LBAM is, in fact, warranted, and, if so, to develop a response that truly protects
human health and the environment.
Governor Schwarzenegger, your environmental efforts on behalf of the State and country on climate
change have been remarkable. By placing your signature on AB32 (Global Warming Solutions Act) you
set the state and the country on a path to address the most serious threat to the planet that humans have
ever faced. In doing so, you gave concerned California citizens a needed inspiration to redouble our
efforts to take on this and other daunting environmental challenges.
It is our hope that the vision of the future that inspired you to put climate change at the top of the state’s
agenda will also allow you to see that the state’s current approach to addressing the presence of the Light
Brown Apple Moth represents a reliance on the past’s failed policies and antiquated practices.
Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to your response.
On behalf of STOP THE SPRAY EAST BAY (eastbayinfo@stopthespray.org),
Signed: Nan Wishner, Albany; Lynn Elliott-Harding, R.N., Oakland; Thomas Kelly, JD, Berkeley; Jane Kelly, Berkeley; Tara Levy, N.D., Oakland; Lisa Tracy, Ph.D., Oakland.
|
|
About This Blog
Welcome to the Oakland Magazine community blog. This is your place to find out about politics, sports, entertainment and current events. Check in daily to find out what is happening in Oakland and the East Bay and feel free to add comments and start a dialogue of your own.
Our Blogs
Feeds
Categories
Recent Posts
Archives
|
|
Email this page
Print this page
del.icio.us
digg
yahoo!
Comments
Feed
Reader Comments:
The clarity and accuracy of Stop the Spray East Bay's letter speaks for itself. While Secretary Kawamura is pursuing a campaign of disinformation and obfuscation, community groups like SSEB are practicing transparency. The science shows that the LBAM has been in California for many years; that it does not harm crops here; that spraying cannot eradicate it. Furthermore, the declaration of "emergency" status to circumvent ordinary human safeguards was a underhanded maneuver which tipped the CDFA's hand early on. The LBAM was declared an agricultural threat by the U.S. decades ago in order to keep citrus imports from New Zealand from competing against the U.S. agricultural market; it was a cannard then and it is a cannard now.
Secretary Kawamura's attempt to turn rural Californians against urban Californians is a disgusting ploy that the citizens of this state will not tolerate.
Thank you Stop the Spray East Bay for this letter and other activities to fight this crazy LBAM eradication plan. It is not safe, not effective and not even necessary. The lengths the USDA/CDFA are going to protect this program shake my faith in our government. Why is it so hard for a bureaucracy to change direction when confronted with facts?
Stop the Spray East Bay - Thank you for your letter.
Governor Schwarzenegger - rein in CDFA's unethical and illegal practices with the LBAM Project.
USDA - reclassify LBAM of the Class "A" pest list so trade may continue.
Get Educated, Get Involved, and Stop the Spray - The LBAM Spray Is Not: Necessary, Effective, and Safe.
Thank you for the letter to the governor. Of course the Calif. Dept. of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) must mislead Central Valley farmers about the spraying in the Bay Area/Monterey/Santa Cruz.
The truth wouldn't work! Telling them that the CDFA itself has repeatedly stated that the moth is no threat to agriculture wouldnt work.
Telling them that the real reason for the spray is so a very rich businessman (Resnick) can have a trade advantage over New Zealand, which grows the same crops as he, would not bring tears to their eyes. The moth is a minor pest and if Resnick can say CA has zero moths, he'll get more business than New Zealand.
The lie about the time the moth's been here is so they can cry "emergency". Entomologists estimate it's been here at least 10 and probably 40-50 yr.s (based on it's range).
Finally CDFA is leaving out a small detail: scientists are unanimous in their opinion that the spray plan is extraordinarily unlikely to work.